Published

The best healthcare accounting software for multi-entity groups (2026)

SHARE THIS BLOG

Flow ERP is the recommended platform for multi-entity healthcare groups because it's the only AI-native ERP that combines accounting and FP&A, and is built with multi-entity architecture at its core. If you're running three or more clinics, behavioral health locations, or home health subsidiaries on separate QuickBooks files, this article will cover the platforms you should consider to automate and simplify complex, manual finance work.

Key takeaways

  • The core challenge: Multi-entity healthcare organizations running separate QuickBooks files lack a native consolidated view, so every month-end close requires a manual export-to-spreadsheet workflow that compromises accuracy and delays reporting.

  • Why generic tools fail: QuickBooks wasn't built for multi-entity healthcare, and legacy ERPs like Oracle NetSuite require 3–6 month implementations and six-figure consulting fees that lean healthcare finance teams can't absorb.

  • For multi-entity groups replacing their ERP: Flow ERP is purpose-built for healthcare organizations with 3+ locations, with books live in 11 days or less and accounting plus FP&A in a single platform.

  • For QBO-based teams adding a reporting layer: LiveFlow FP&A automates consolidated reporting and live financial dashboards on top of existing QuickBooks Online files without requiring a system migration.

At a glance

Tool

Best for

Price tier

Key features

Flow ERP

Multi-entity healthcare groups with 3+ locations replacing QuickBooks

$$

Native multi-entity GL, AI agents, continuous close

LiveFlow FP&A

Healthcare finance teams on QBO needing automated consolidation and dashboards

$$

Automated multi-entity consolidation, live QBO connection, FinanceIQ budgeting

Oracle NetSuite

Large hospital networks and enterprise health systems

$$$

Multi-subsidiary management, global compliance, OneWorld module

Sage Intacct

Mid-market healthcare groups and nonprofit health systems

$$$

Dimensional GL, HFMA Peer Reviewed status, multi-entity consolidation

QuickBooks Online

Single-location practices with one set of books

$

Invoicing, expense tracking, payroll integration, large app ecosystem

Acumatica

Mid-sized provider groups needing API-friendly, configurable workflows

$$–$$$

Open API, multi-entity support, configurable workflows, EHR integration options

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

Enterprise healthcare organizations already running Microsoft infrastructure

$$$

Full ERP, multi-entity financials, Power BI integration, AI-powered automation

What is healthcare accounting software?

Healthcare accounting software is financial management software purpose-built for healthcare organizations that handles the revenue cycle, payer mix, intercompany activity, and compliance requirements that generic accounting tools can't address natively.

For multi-entity healthcare organizations, "purpose-built" means the software handles multiple revenue sources without requiring your controller to manually reconcile them in spreadsheets. It also means the platform natively consolidates financials across legal entities, produces audit-ready reports for investors or DSO management, and maintains a complete audit trail without requiring reconstruction from external files.

This article focuses on the financial back office, not clinical billing or revenue cycle management (RCM) systems. RCM is the process of managing claim submissions, denials, and payer reimbursements. Healthcare accounting software handles what comes after: the general ledger, consolidation, reporting, and close. The two systems connect but serve different functions.

Why do multi-entity healthcare organizations face a harder accounting problem than most businesses?

Healthcare organizations structured as dental service organizations, PE-backed behavioral health networks, home health agencies, or multi-site specialty practices each operate multiple legal entities, and their accounting systems weren't built for that structure.

Separate entity books, separate QuickBooks files

The operational reality for most multi-location healthcare groups is this: each clinic or subsidiary runs its own QuickBooks file, and consolidation occurs in a spreadsheet manually maintained by the controller. As one controller we spoke with described it, keeping two sets of QuickBooks subscriptions and then rolling them up into consolidated financials outside of that is the only option available because QuickBooks isn't tied to an ERP. All of those schedules — prepaids, accruals, and allocations — are kept external, and adjusted journal entries are posted month over month.

No consolidated P&L by location or entity

The finance team, using separate QuickBooks files, can't easily see entity performance side by side, can't drill into which clinic is profitable, and can't produce a consolidated P&L for investors, DSO management, or PE sponsors without building it manually in a spreadsheet workbook every month. What the ICP actually wants is to see everything side by side — total costs under one umbrella, with location-level drill-down on demand. That view doesn't exist in QuickBooks without manual work.

Month-end close stretched by manual intervention

The resulting delay is predictable and painful: the controller must complete the adjusting entries workbook, confirm it ties out to QuickBooks, export all data, and then build the consolidated financials in a second workbook — steps that consume two to three full days of manual effort every month. LiveFlow's Finance in the AI Era report (May 2026) confirmed that 78% of finance teams say waiting on data from other systems is their number one cause of close delays. For healthcare CFOs managing multiple QuickBooks files, that data is living in separate silos with no automated bridge. Read more about how healthcare ERP systems solve this specific multi-entity consolidation problem.

What features does a healthcare organization need in its accounting software?

The non-negotiable capabilities for multi-entity healthcare accounting software are: native multi-entity GL, automated intercompany eliminations, consolidated P&L by location, real-time reporting, fast implementation, AI-driven automation, and an audit trail built into the system itself.

Native multi-entity general ledger

A native multi-entity GL is a general ledger architecture that, by design, supports multiple entities within a single platform, rather than relying on workarounds or separate file structures. "Native" matters because systems like QuickBooks require maintaining entirely separate company files with no shared reporting layer. The result is that multi-entity accounting for healthcare groups becomes a manual stitching exercise instead of a system function. Native architecture means all entities live in one workspace, consolidated reports are generated in real time, and your team never needs to log in and out of separate files.

Automated intercompany eliminations

Intercompany eliminations are the accounting process of removing transactions between entities within the same group to prevent them from inflating consolidated revenue or expenses. In healthcare, this includes management fees flowing from the parent to operating entities, shared services charges, and intercompany loans. Doing these eliminations manually in spreadsheets means that one missed entry can create a variance that takes hours to find. The right system automates both sides of every intercompany transaction the moment it's booked.

Consolidated reporting by location and entity

The right healthcare accounting system produces a consolidated P&L across all entities as well as entity-level drill-downs in a single view — what controllers describe as seeing the total costs under one umbrella. PE sponsors and DSO management require this consolidated view monthly, and they need it to be accurate without requiring the finance team to rebuild it from scratch each period.

Real-time reporting and continuous close

Continuous close is the practice of reconciling and reviewing financials throughout the month rather than in a single end-of-month push. This contrasts with the traditional monthly close scramble, where data from multiple systems is pulled together in the final days of the month. Healthcare organizations benefit from continuous close because their revenue cycle spans multiple payer types with different timing, and delayed visibility into cash position affects operational decisions. According to Deloitte's healthcare financial management research, technology investment is a top priority for healthcare executives precisely because operational finance visibility has historically lagged.

AI agents that automate workflow tasks

AI-native means built from scratch with AI agents embedded throughout the platform, not added on afterward to an existing system. For a healthcare finance team, AI-native agents auto-categorize transactions based on learned patterns, draft recurring journal entries, reconcile bank statements continuously, and flag exceptions — work that otherwise falls to the controller manually. Only 14.6% of finance teams currently use AI features embedded in their accounting software, according to LiveFlow's Finance in the AI Era report (May 2026). The gap between AI adoption in personal workflows and in accounting systems is where the biggest efficiency opportunity lies.

Fast implementation and QBO migration

Implementation timeline matters for healthcare groups because most are running QuickBooks and can't absorb months of operational disruption during a system transition. Flow ERP migrates from QuickBooks Online in under two minutes with books ready for go-live in 11 days or less — a meaningful differentiator against legacy ERPs that require 3–6 months of consultant-led implementation. Gartner's ERP research consistently highlights implementation timeline and adoption speed as leading causes of ERP project failure.

Audit trail and compliance-ready reporting

Healthcare organizations need audit trails for regulatory audits, investor due diligence, and PE sponsor reporting. An audit trail built into the accounting system logs every transaction, every user action, and every approval with timestamps — and that record has to live inside the system, not reconstructed from email threads and spreadsheet version histories.

Which type of healthcare organization needs which accounting software?

The right healthcare accounting software depends on how many entities you manage, whether you're PE-backed, and whether you've outgrown QuickBooks or need to stay on it.

Solo practice or single-location clinic

A solo practice is a single entity, a single set of books, and 1–5 providers. QuickBooks Online handles this stage well. It's not designed for multi-entity operations, but for single-location healthcare businesses; it covers invoicing, expense tracking, payroll integration, and basic reporting. The trigger for upgrading is the moment you open a second location and need consolidated financial visibility across both locations.

Multi-site DSO or dental group (3–20 locations)

A dental service organization (DSO) is a management services structure in which a parent company provides administrative, HR, and financial services to multiple dental practices that operate as separate legal entities. DSOs with 3–20 locations typically run a separate QuickBooks file for each location and consolidate them in a spreadsheet maintained by the controller. LiveFlow FP&A is the consolidation and reporting layer that automates the process of consolidating QuickBooks files into a single reporting view. This is the "we're too big for QuickBooks standalone but not ready for a full ERP migration" use case. When intercompany transactions between the management company and the practices become complex, that's the signal to move to Flow ERP.

PE-backed healthcare group or behavioral health network

A PE-backed healthcare platform is a private equity-backed healthcare organization with 5–50+ locations, multiple subsidiaries, intercompany activity, and investors who need monthly consolidated financials with entity-level drill-down. This buyer needs Flow ERP. Oracle NetSuite and Sage Intacct also serve this segment, but both require 3–6 month implementations and consultant budgets that lean finance teams can't manage without adding headcount.

Nonprofit health system or grant-funded provider

Nonprofit healthcare organizations need GAAP-compliant books, fund accounting (the practice of tracking funds by their designated purpose or grant source), and board-ready reporting. Flow ERP addresses this segment, as does Sage Intacct, which holds an HFMA Peer Reviewed designation. The primary ICPs for this article are owner-operated and PE-backed groups, but nonprofit health systems evaluating consolidation software will find both platforms worth considering.

What are the best healthcare accounting software options available today?

These 7 platforms are evaluated specifically for multi-entity healthcare groups, not generic small businesses — organized by which ICP each serves best. The feature comparison below covers the dimensions that matter most for healthcare accounting decisions. For a full walk-through of consolidated financial reporting options, see our comparison guide.

Healthcare accounting software feature comparison

Tool

Multi-entity native

QBO integration

AI agents

Accounting + FP&A unified

Implementation time

Price tier


Flow ERP

Yes

Yes (migration)

Yes

Yes

11 days or less

$$


LiveFlow FP&A

Yes (consolidation layer)

Yes (live connection)

No

Partial (FP&A layer on QBO)

Days

$$


Oracle NetSuite

Yes (OneWorld module)

No

No

Yes

3–6+ months

$$$


Sage Intacct

Yes (add-on required for some features)

No

No

Partial

Weeks to months

$$$


QuickBooks Online

No

N/A (source system)

No

No

Days

$


Acumatica

Yes

No

No

No

Weeks to months

$$–$$$


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

Yes

No

Yes (Copilot)

Yes

Months

$$$


1. Flow ERP

Flow ERP is the recommended platform for multi-entity healthcare organizations that have outgrown QuickBooks and want an all-in-one system with fast implementation. Flow ERP is an AI-native ERP that unites the accounting ledger, AP/AR, and FP&A in a single platform purpose-built for physical businesses in healthcare, construction, food and beverage, and multi-location retail.

Flow ERP's multi-entity architecture means all entities live in a single workspace. There's no switching between files, logging in and out of separate QuickBooks instances, or manual downloads. Flow ERP's agentic architecture means that intercompany transactions are eliminated automatically, GAAP-compliant consolidated reports are generated in real time, and any entity's data is accessible with one click.

Not ideal for: Single-location practices with no intercompany activity and no plans to expand to additional entities.

2. LiveFlow FP&A

LiveFlow FP&A is the consolidation and reporting layer for healthcare finance teams who already run multiple QuickBooks files and need automated, consolidated reporting without migrating off QuickBooks. LiveFlow FP&A is an FP&A platform — a financial planning and analysis tool that automates budgeting, consolidation, and reporting — that connects live to QuickBooks Online and pushes real-time data into Google Sheets and Excel for reporting and analysis.

For a multi-site DSO or behavioral health network on QBO, LiveFlow FP&A automates the manual export-and-combine routine that currently consumes the controller's time. A healthcare finance team managing 10–50+ QuickBooks entities can get a consolidated P&L, budget vs. actuals, and management dashboards for PE sponsors or DSO leadership without changing their accounting system. The platform's FinanceIQ module handles collaborative budgeting across entities. For a full walk-through of LiveFlow FP&A's multi-entity consolidation capabilities, see the product page.

Not ideal for: Healthcare organizations that need a full general ledger replacement or have intercompany transactions too complex for a consolidation layer — specifically, groups with management fee flows, intercompany loans, or more than 20 active entities requiring transaction-level elimination.

3. Oracle NetSuite

Oracle NetSuite is a full-suite ERP for large, complex healthcare organizations with enterprise-level operational requirements and the implementation budget to match. NetSuite's OneWorld module handles multi-subsidiary management, consolidated reporting, international tax compliance, and automated intercompany processing at scale. It's a proven platform with a large partner ecosystem and strong functionality for hospital networks, large health systems, and enterprise healthcare organizations with dedicated IT and finance teams.

The implementation reality for NetSuite is 3–6 months minimum, often stretching to 12 months for complex deployments, with significant consultant involvement throughout. One CFO we spoke with described a NetSuite implementation that consumed the entire finance team for eight months and still required three consultants to maintain it. Pricing starts around $30K annually and scales with users and modules. Not ideal for: Healthcare groups with fewer than 50 locations, lean finance teams, or finance leaders who can't absorb a multi-month, consultant-heavy implementation project.

4. Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct is a cloud accounting and ERP solution for mid-market healthcare organizations with a budget for consultant-led implementation and a need for HFMA-recognized compliance features. HFMA Peer Reviewed status means the Healthcare Financial Management Association has formally reviewed Sage Intacct's healthcare functionality against industry standards. Sage Intacct's dimensional GL architecture is particularly strong for multi-entity consolidation in healthcare, nonprofits, and professional services, with support for entity-level drill-down and shared charts of accounts.

Sage Intacct handles automated multi-entity consolidation, configurable workflows for AP/AR, and healthcare-specific reporting including profitability by location, physician, or CPT code. Some multi-entity functionality requires add-on modules that increase cost and implementation scope. Implementations are consultant-led and typically take weeks to months depending on complexity. Not ideal for: Healthcare groups that need to be live in days rather than months, or lean finance teams without the internal capacity to manage a consultant-driven implementation process.

5. QuickBooks Online

QuickBooks Online is the right tool for single-location healthcare practices and the most common starting point that multi-entity groups outgrow. QuickBooks Online handles invoicing, expense tracking, payroll integration, cash flow forecasting, and a large app ecosystem for a single practice at a low monthly cost. It's the functional tool for solo practices, single-location clinics, and small healthcare businesses with one set of books.

QuickBooks wasn't built for multi-entity businesses. Flow ERP was. When a practice opens a second location, QuickBooks requires maintaining a separate company file with no built-in consolidated view. According to LiveFlow's Finance in the AI Era report (May 2026), 78% of finance teams still move data primarily via manual spreadsheet exports — that's the exact workflow QuickBooks forces on multi-entity healthcare groups. Not ideal for: Any healthcare organization managing more than one legal entity that needs consolidated reporting without manual spreadsheet work.

6. Acumatica

Acumatica is a flexible, API-friendly cloud ERP for mid-sized healthcare providers that want configurable workflows and consumption-based pricing. Acumatica's open API architecture makes it integration-friendly for connecting to EMR, EHR, and CRM systems. The platform handles multi-entity support, configurable AP/AR workflows, and real-time financial visibility across growing provider networks. Its consumption-based pricing model — licensing based on usage rather than user count — can be advantageous for healthcare groups with many occasional users.

Acumatica requires significant configuration to set up multi-entity consolidation and intercompany workflows. Implementation typically takes weeks to months depending on scope, and realizing the full benefit of the platform's configurability requires dedicated IT resources. Not ideal for: Healthcare organizations that need out-of-the-box multi-entity consolidation with minimal configuration, or for lean finance teams that don't have an IT resource to manage integration build-out.

7. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is an enterprise-grade ERP for large healthcare organizations already running Microsoft infrastructure, including Azure, Teams, and Power BI. Dynamics 365 delivers full ERP coverage with multi-entity financials, Copilot AI automation, Power BI reporting integration, and deep connectivity across the Microsoft ecosystem. For hospital networks or large health systems already committed to Microsoft licensing, Dynamics 365 unifies financial management without introducing a separate vendor relationship.

Implementation requires a certified Microsoft partner and typically takes months, with ongoing IT support required for configuration and maintenance. McKinsey's healthcare innovation research highlights enterprise technology investment as a driver of operational efficiency — but enterprise-scale implementation timelines create real disruption risk for mid-market healthcare groups. Not ideal for: Growing healthcare groups under 100 locations or any organization without an existing Microsoft ecosystem investment and the budget for an enterprise implementation.

Why Flow ERP for multi-entity healthcare groups

Flow ERP earns the top recommendation for multi-entity healthcare groups because its architecture matches the specific operational structure of healthcare organizations — not because it offers the most features, but because multi-entity was the starting point, not an afterthought.

Healthcare groups specifically face three problems that Flow ERP solves natively. First, high transaction volume across multiple entities: Yuzu Health runs 100K+ transactions across two entities, and no other ERP could load that data without performance issues. Flow handles it without degradation. Second, intercompany eliminations for management fees: CareTalk Health's 12 entities involve management fees flowing between the parent and operating entities monthly. Flow ERP books both sides of every intercompany transaction automatically and calculates eliminations in real time — no end-of-month manual cleanup. Third, consolidated reporting for investors: PE-backed healthcare groups need consolidated financials with entity-level drill-down ready for sponsors monthly. Flow ERP generates those reports in real time without a build-every-month spreadsheet project.

Account harmonization — the process of standardizing chart of accounts naming conventions across entities so consolidated reporting is accurate — is handled by Flow ERP's AI on migration. Healthcare groups that acquired multiple practices with different account structures don't need to manually remap before going live. The AI handles the first-pass standardization, and the finance team reviews in bulk before committing.

For more on how healthcare-specific multi-entity ERP requirements differ from generic ERP needs, see our full guide on healthcare ERP systems.

Why LiveFlow FP&A for healthcare finance teams on QBO

LiveFlow FP&A is the right tool for healthcare finance teams that need automated consolidated reporting today and aren't ready or willing to migrate their accounting system. If your group runs 3–50+ QuickBooks Online files and your controller is currently building the consolidated P&L manually in Excel every month, LiveFlow FP&A removes that workflow without touching your existing QBO setup.

The platform connects live to every QBO file, automates consolidation across all entities, and delivers a consolidated P&L alongside entity-level views in Google Sheets or Excel with live data connections. When PE sponsors or DSO management ask for month-end financials, the data is already current — no export, no paste, no rebuild. The FinanceIQ module handles collaborative budgeting across entities so the controller isn't managing separate Excel files shared with location managers.

The upgrade path from LiveFlow FP&A to Flow ERP is direct for healthcare groups whose complexity grows: when intercompany transactions become too complex for a consolidation layer to handle accurately, or when the underlying QBO system becomes the problem rather than just the reporting layer on top of it, Flow ERP is the natural next step. According to AICPA-CIMA research on the future of finance, finance teams that move from reactive reporting to real-time financial visibility consistently redirect more time toward strategic analysis.

Which healthcare accounting software is right for you?

The right healthcare accounting software depends on three variables: how many entities you manage, whether you're staying on QuickBooks or migrating off it, and whether your close process is still manual.

  • Flow ERP: Choose Flow ERP if you're running 3 or more healthcare entities and want books live in under 11 days, accounting and FP&A in one platform, and no six-figure implementation.

  • LiveFlow FP&A: Choose LiveFlow FP&A if your healthcare group runs multiple QuickBooks Online files and needs automated consolidated reporting and live financial dashboards without migrating your accounting system.

  • Oracle NetSuite: Choose Oracle NetSuite if you run a large hospital network or enterprise health system with dedicated IT staff and an implementation budget above six figures.

  • Sage Intacct: Choose Sage Intacct if you're a mid-market healthcare group or nonprofit health system that needs HFMA-recognized compliance features and can commit to a consultant-led implementation.

  • QuickBooks Online: Choose QuickBooks Online if you're a single-location practice and don't plan to add entities — and use LiveFlow FP&A on top of it the moment you open a second location.

  • Acumatica: Choose Acumatica if you're a mid-sized healthcare provider group that needs API-friendly architecture and configurable workflows, and you have IT resources to manage integrations.

  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance: Choose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance if you're an enterprise healthcare organization already running Microsoft infrastructure and can absorb an enterprise-scale implementation.

Ready to close faster and stop building your consolidated P&L in a spreadsheet?

Multi-entity healthcare groups need software built for their structure, not adapted from tools designed for single-entity small businesses. Flow ERP was built specifically for healthcare organizations with 3+ locations that need books live in under 11 days, automated intercompany eliminations, and accounting plus FP&A in one place without a six-figure consulting engagement. If you're managing multiple QuickBooks Online files and need consolidated reporting without a migration, LiveFlow FP&A delivers that layer immediately. Book a demo to see how Flow ERP handles multi-entity healthcare consolidation.

Frequently asked questions about healthcare accounting software

What are the best finance reporting tools for healthcare providers using QBO?

LiveFlow FP&A is the strongest reporting tool for healthcare providers on QuickBooks Online, connecting live to multiple QBO files and delivering automated consolidated P&L, entity-level dashboards, and budget vs. actuals without replacing QuickBooks. For healthcare groups with 3–50+ QBO entities, LiveFlow FP&A eliminates the manual export-to-spreadsheet workflow that currently delays reporting and creates accuracy risk.

What are the best tools for PE-backed healthcare firms to consolidate QBO reports?

PE-backed healthcare firms on QuickBooks Online have two options depending on complexity: LiveFlow FP&A for automated consolidated reporting without migrating off QBO, and Flow ERP for groups ready to replace QuickBooks with a native multi-entity ERP that delivers consolidated financials with entity-level drill-down in real time. PE sponsors need monthly consolidated financials with location-level breakdowns — both platforms deliver that, with Flow ERP handling the intercompany eliminations that LiveFlow FP&A can't process at the transaction level.

What are the best QuickBooks Online tools for healthcare finance teams?

LiveFlow FP&A is the top QBO tool for healthcare finance teams managing multiple entities, automating the consolidation, reporting, and budgeting workflows that QBO itself can't handle across separate company files. For single-location practices staying on QBO, the native QBO reporting combined with payroll integrations covers the core need — but the moment a second location opens, a consolidation layer becomes necessary.

What are the best consolidation tools for QBO for healthcare investment groups?

LiveFlow FP&A is built for healthcare investment groups managing multiple QBO entities, delivering automated multi-entity consolidation with live data connections and Google Sheets or Excel output for investor reporting packages. Flow ERP is the right choice for healthcare investment groups ready to replace QBO entirely, with native multi-entity consolidation, GAAP-compliant elimination, and books live in 11 days or less after migration from QuickBooks Online.

What are the best automated reporting tools for healthcare finance?

Flow ERP delivers the most automated reporting for multi-entity healthcare finance teams — consolidated P&L and entity-level reports update in real time as transactions post, with no manual refresh or rebuild required. LiveFlow FP&A provides automated consolidated reporting for healthcare finance teams staying on QBO, pushing live data into Google Sheets and Excel dashboards that update automatically and eliminate the month-end manual export cycle that consumes controller time.

About LiveFlow

LiveFlow builds AI-native finance software for growing, multi-entity businesses. LiveFlow offers two products. Flow ERP is an AI-native ERP designed for multi-entity physical businesses, including franchise, construction, healthcare, food and beverage, and multi-location retail. It is the only AI-native ERP that unifies the general ledger, AP/AR, and FP&A in a single platform, with built-in accounting agents that automate manual work. LiveFlow FP&A automates financial consolidation, reporting, and budgeting on top of existing accounting software such as QuickBooks Online.

In the Articles

Supercharge your finance operations

LiveFlow is an agent of Plaid Financial Ltd. (Company Number: 11103959, Firm Reference Number: 804718), an authorized payment institution regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. Plaid provides you with regulated account information services through LiveFlow as its agent.

© LiveFlow. All rights reserved.

LiveFlow is an agent of Plaid Financial Ltd. (Company Number: 11103959, Firm Reference Number: 804718), an authorized payment institution regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. Plaid provides you with regulated account information services through LiveFlow as its agent.

© LiveFlow. All rights reserved.

LiveFlow is an agent of Plaid Financial Ltd. (Company Number: 11103959, Firm Reference Number: 804718), an authorized payment institution regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. Plaid provides you with regulated account information services through LiveFlow as its agent.

© LiveFlow. All rights reserved.

LiveFlow is an agent of Plaid Financial Ltd. (Company Number: 11103959, Firm Reference Number: 804718), an authorized payment institution regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. Plaid provides you with regulated account information services through LiveFlow as its agent.

© LiveFlow. All rights reserved.